If I'm ever sued, this site will go up for sale for the amount of damages sought, along with posting any documents I receive. If you think you can copyright a letter you send to me, go for it.
I'm still learning about blog design and I've found a problem when viewing this blog. It does not behave properly in small browser windows and if your display resolution is less than 1280 pixels wide and/or you are viewing the blog in a window less than 980 pixels blog wide, the right side bar is pushed below any visible post. I've searched the web and looked at the code for hours but can't find the problem. My next step, when I get the time, is to recreate the blog with a new template. Advice is appreciated.
Showing posts with label corruption. Show all posts
Showing posts with label corruption. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 26, 2009

Roland Burris & Blago - Chicago's Dream Team

Bloomberg reports that the FBI may (and the radio news just said would) turn over a wiretap to the Senate Ethics Committee, reportedly a conversation where Burris offered Blago's a "Blago campaign contribution" for the vacant Illinois senate seat.

"Senator Burris does not object to the Senate Ethics Committee hearing the tape", said his lawyer.

I would remind the Senator that Gary Hart, John Edwards and Bill Clinton, to name a few, also said "bring it on" and we see the results. Two who were never elected and one  who was impeached, though acquitted.

Perhaps it just Daley politics as usual out of the Windy City state but when the wind is blowing west, the stench is obvious even in Colorado.

You say Roland Burris has ties to mob controlled unions ? Who knows what the truth is?

Friday, May 22, 2009

California Financial Crisis and SEIU

From what I gather SEIU boss, Andy Stern, is not a real nice guy and some of the SEIU tactics are more reminiscent of a 30's gangster movie or the early Hoffa Teamsters than what you'd expect in 2009 America. Be that as it may, Google Reader just brought me an interesting WTH post on THE UNION LABEL BLOG. WTH (Warner Todd Huston) attributes his post to the Jon Ortiz The State Worker blog on the Sacramento Bee site.

The interesting tidbit both report:

Ortiz notes that on page 18 of the overview of the 2009-10 state budget, the report suggests the following:

The Legislature could direct the administration to score budgetary savings if it chooses not to approve the labor agreements proposed by the Governor with the state employee units represented by Service Employees International Union Local 1000. (These agreements reduce the number of furlough days for these state workers from two days per month to one day per month.) In addition, the Legislature could reduce state employee salaries by an additional 4.6 percent in 2009-10 for more General Fund savings.

Someone in the state's Legislative Analyst's Office grew a pair and decided to "tell it like it is" It remains to be seen what the SEIU reaction is going to be.

photo courtsey of WIKIMEDIA COMMONS

Wednesday, May 20, 2009

American Rights At Work

"The Trib's "Obama's union sop" editorial (May 10 and TribLIVE.com) on union transparency, the Employee Free Choice Act and President Obama's commitment to both replaced fact with fiction.

First and foremost, the Obama administration is in no way pushing union transparency under the rug. We can now be confident that the Labor Department's Office of Labor-Management Standards is more balanced and will go after anyone who violates the law, no longer using political ideology to harass workers and their unions.

The Employee Free Choice Act would not eliminate the secret ballot election, but rather would allow workers, not their bosses, the choice in how to form a union. It would, however, tear down the roadblocks that workers face when trying to join unions, so they can bargain for fair wages, benefits and job security. Once that happens, we can truly get on the path toward recovery and create an economy that works for everyone again.

Whether the Trib editorial board likes it or not, the American public overwhelmingly voted for change in November and supports worker-friendly policies like the Employee Free Choice Act.

Kimberly Freeman

Washington, D.C.

The writer is acting executive director of American Rights at Work, a nonprofit advocacy organization."

Published May 20th, 2009 Pittsburg TribLive


Google Reader found Ms. Freeman's interesting article this morning. I knew little about American Rights at Work (ARW), "Advancing Democracy in the American Workplace", so I paid them a visit. A peek at the Board of Directors and About US will tell you everything you need to know about American Rights at Work "fair and balanced" editorial policy.

It's not so much that I fault Ms. Freeman's views as without truth; it's that I'd like some of whatever she's smoking and she didn't tell us where to get it.

My old hillbilly farmer friend, Jeb, told me "Have pitchfork, will travel". He said he'd be happy to collect the large piles of smelly stuff to take home and spread on the fields. "Makes the maeders and corn (Jeb don't speak good english) grow".

On a more serious note, I'm offended that Ms. Freeman thinks the American public is stupid enough to buy "Advancing Democracy in the American Workplace" from a union shill group. I have no problem with Ms. Freeman's right to her views but get a clue! 

It's 2009 and we have the Internet. You can no longer write something, publish it in a newspaper and have folks believe it as gospel; the print newspapers are about to go the way of the dinosaurs and facts are too easy to check.

Visit the ShopFloor and read the February 6th post on Labor Secretary Solis's (then Representative Solis, D-CA, and the treasurer of ARW) confirmation. You can also read the Feburary 5th Washington Examiner Editorial Opinion.

If I were were a conspiracy nut, I could have a field day. Let's see: "President Obama appointed Secretary Solis who was a member of the house from California and treasurer/board member of ARW. Obama and Solis have "promised" less union oversight by OLMS and Obama has proposed cutting their budget by 9%. The SEIU has had a lot of trouble with corruption in California. The union contributed heavily to Obama and other liberal candidates with ARW taking the point in some campaign contributions.

Ah ha! Little green men are carrying bags of money from the Daddy Warbucks International Bank of Members Money directly into the Oval Office, Jimmy Hoffa is still alive and running the Teamsters from his snowshoe rental stand in Siberia and the news of Elvis's death was greatly exaggerated; he was just spotted in a rural Georgia Winn-Dixie buying an RC Cola and a Moon Pie.

That's my story and I'm sticking to it! - it's as believable as the yarns being spun by Ms. Freeman.

 

Image courtesy of Bigoo.WS


Saturday, May 16, 2009

Grip of the Mob Is Gone in This Race, a Union Says



This post, of course, is a look at the infamous Amalgamated Transit Union (ATU) Local 1181 located in Ozone Park, N.Y. Federal prosecutors claimed that the LU was controlled by the Genovese crime family for at least 30 years before the "clean-up" and  ATU International finally putting trustees in charge on November 11th, 2006.

The International trustees ran Local 1181 from then until the trusteeship officially ended Friday, April 3rd, 2009, after the election of new local bosses in March.




Needless to say, elections have winners and losers and someone is going to be unhappy:


I was able to collect disclosure information going back to 2000 so you can look at Local 1181 LM-2's for the last years of mob control and the LM-2's through June 30th, 2008 when ATU International had control.

I'm not sure what disclosure is required now that the trusteeship has ended. I belonged to a ATU LU in trusteeship, Local 1755, but we voted to join Local 1001 when the Trusteeship ended on June 30th, 2008. Local 1755 had to file a terminal LM-2 and Local 1001 had to start filing LM-2's as of July 1st, 2008 because it now had both public and private employee members. I suspect that Local 1181 will be required (assuming that the Obama administration doesn't gut LMRDA) to file it's normal 2009 LM-2 after the local's fiscal year ends June 30th, 2009; perhaps showing the change from International to Local control as a comment. Corrections to my assumption welcome!

I am curious as to why it appears that ATU International took so long to act:


I have my own ongoing disclosure battle with ATU Local 1001 and I've written to President George several time asking for help. When I began, I naively thought that ATU International actually monitored the LU's and was concerned with corruption and the individual members money. I've now come to realize that my lone voice has about as much effect as a fart in a hurricane.

For those that have the time and interest, here are the Local 1181 LM-2's from 2000 through 2008:


Here is some more background information for anyone interested: 









I'll reserve any farther thought and comment until a later date and perhaps share my own experience in attempting to force LU disclosure.